From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greer v. York County Prison

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 28, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-2248 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 28, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-2248.

December 28, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2007, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 2), and it appearing at this early stage in the proceedings that plaintiff is capable of properly and forcefully prosecuting his claims and that resolution of the facial merit of plaintiff's claims neither implicates complex legal or factual issues nor requires factual investigation or the testimony of expert witnesses, see Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 155-57 (3d Cir. 1993) (listing factors relevant to request for counsel), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 2) is DENIED. If further proceedings demonstrate the need for counsel, the matter will be reconsidered either sua sponte or upon motion of plaintiff. See id.


Summaries of

Greer v. York County Prison

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 28, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-2248 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Greer v. York County Prison

Case Details

Full title:HORATIO O. GREER, Plaintiff v. YORK COUNTY PRISON, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 28, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-2248 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 28, 2007)