From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greer v. Cnty. of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 9, 2022
19cv378-JO-DEB (S.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2022)

Opinion

19cv378-JO-DEB

12-09-2022

Frankie Greer, Plaintiff, v. County of San Diego et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OVERRULING OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S DISCOVERY ORDER, AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO STRIKE

Hon. Jinsook Ohta, United States District Judge

Defendants Francisco Bravo, Michael Campos, Macy Germono, and Christopher Simms filed motions for summary judgment. Dkts. 206, 207, 209, 210. Defendant County of San Diego filed objections to Magistrate Judge Butcher's discovery ruling. Dkt. 232. Plaintiff Frankie Greer filed a partial motion for summary judgment as to his ADA and Rehabilitation Act causes of action. Dkt. 218. Plaintiff also filed a motion to strike the Declaration of Serina Rognlien-Hood. Dkt. 249.

The Court held oral argument on the motions on December 7, 2022. For the reasons stated on the record during the oral argument, the Court denies Defendants Francisco Bravo, Michael Campos, Macy Germono, and Christopher Simms' motions for summary judgment [Dkts. 206, 207, 209, 210], overrules the County of San Diego's objections to Magistrate Judge Butcher's discovery ruling [Dkt. 232], denies Plaintiff's partial motion for summary judgment [Dkt. 218], and denies Plaintiff's motion to strike as moot [Dkt. 249].

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Greer v. Cnty. of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 9, 2022
19cv378-JO-DEB (S.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Greer v. Cnty. of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:Frankie Greer, Plaintiff, v. County of San Diego et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Dec 9, 2022

Citations

19cv378-JO-DEB (S.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2022)