Greenwood v. State

Full title: Stanford GREENWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR .

Date published: May 17, 2016

504 S.W.3d 67 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

ED 103195

05-17-2016

Stanford GREENWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Kristina Starke Olson, District Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Kristina Starke Olson, District Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanford Greenwood ("Movant") appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).