From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenwood v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 14, 2016
189 So. 3d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–5221.

04-14-2016

James GREENWOOD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Barry W. Beroset of Beroset & Keene, Pensacola, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Charlie Lee and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Barry W. Beroset of Beroset & Keene, Pensacola, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Charlie Lee and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Greenwood v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 14, 2016
189 So. 3d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Greenwood v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GREENWOOD, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 14, 2016

Citations

189 So. 3d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
2016 WL 1464566