From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenwood v. Maketa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 19, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02187-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02187-LTB-BNB

09-19-2011

ROBERT A. GREENWOOD, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF TERRY MAKETA, LT. HEINLE, EID #90022, COMMANDER R. KING, EID #88010, PROGRAMS MANAGER FRANK LAPAGE, COMMANDER WILLIAM C. MISTRETTA, EID #74001, ABRIGHT, Aramark, and LT. BRANDT, EID #95011, et al., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland


ORDER

This matter arises on Defendants Aramark and Bright's Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery [Doc. #49, filed 09/09/2011] (the "Motion"). The Motion is GRANTED.

On August 16, 2011, the plaintiff served Aramark and Bright with Requests for Production pursuant to Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P. However, a scheduling conference has not yet been held; no scheduling order has been entered; and discovery has not yet commenced. Therefore, the plaintiff“s discovery requests are premature.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion [Doc. # 49] is GRANTED; and

(2) Discovery is stayed pending a scheduling conference and the entry of a scheduling order.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Greenwood v. Maketa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 19, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02187-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Greenwood v. Maketa

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT A. GREENWOOD, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF TERRY MAKETA, LT. HEINLE, EID…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02187-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 19, 2011)