From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenway Med. Supply Corp. v. MVAIC

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Apr 9, 2021
71 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)

Opinion

2020-106 K C

04-09-2021

GREENWAY MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP., as Assignee of Cabrera, Iris, Appellant, v. MVAIC, Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J.Toell and Karina Barska of counsel), for appellant. Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Jeffrey Kadushin of counsel), for respondent.


The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J.Toell and Karina Barska of counsel), for appellant.

Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Jeffrey Kadushin of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., MICHELLE WESTON, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) was served with the summons and complaint on October 12, 2018. Plaintiff filed proof of service of the summons and complaint on October 18, 2018 and subsequently applied to the clerk for a default judgment. A judgment was entered on February 7, 2019 upon defendant's claimed failure to appear or answer the complaint. Defendant moved to vacate the default judgment, alleging that its attorney had served an answer on plaintiff's attorneys by mail on November 1, 2018. A copy of the affidavit of service was annexed to defendant's motion papers. By order entered July 22, 2019, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion.

Defendant established that it timely appeared in the action by mailing the answer to plaintiff's attorney on November 1, 2018 (see CPLR 320 [a] ; 2103 [b] [2]; CCA 2102 ; Goonan v New York City Tr. Auth. , 74 AD3d 747 [2010] ). While plaintiff's attorney claimed that her office did not receive the answer, her affirmation and the affidavit of counsel's employee were insufficient to rebut defendant's proof of service of the answer. Since defendant has established that it did not default, there was no basis for the entry of the judgment (see Goonan , 74 AD3d 747 ), and the Civil Court properly granted defendant's motion to vacate it (see Carlton v Vorosmarty , 163 AD2d 630 [1990] ; Marazita v Nelbach , 91 AD2d 604 [1982] ).

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

ALIOTTA, P.J., WESTON and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Greenway Med. Supply Corp. v. MVAIC

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Apr 9, 2021
71 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
Case details for

Greenway Med. Supply Corp. v. MVAIC

Case Details

Full title:Greenway Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Cabrera, Iris, Appellant, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Apr 9, 2021

Citations

71 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 50303
142 N.Y.S.3d 275