Greenville Cnty. v. Brooks

Full title: Greenville County, Respondent, v. Dennis Darrell Brooks, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 2, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2011-192348 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-192348 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-002

01-02-2013

Greenville County, Respondent, v. Dennis Darrell Brooks, Appellant.

Grant Henry Gibson, of G. Gibson & Associates, LLC, of Taylors, for Appellant. H. Dean Campbell and Kimberly N. Wunder, both of the Greenville County Attorney's Office, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Greenville County

G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Grant Henry Gibson, of G. Gibson & Associates, LLC, of Taylors, for Appellant.

H. Dean Campbell and Kimberly N. Wunder, both of the Greenville County Attorney's Office, of Greenville, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Indigo Assocs. v. Ryan Inv. Co., 314 S.C. 519, 523, 431 S.E.2d 271, 273 (Ct. App. 1993) ("The circuit court, acting as an appellate court in a case heard by the magistrate, cannot consider questions that have not been presented to the magistrate."); State v. Gault, 375 S.C. 570, 573, 654 S.E.2d 98, 99-100 (Ct. App. 2007) (holding a constitutional argument advanced on appeal to the circuit court but not raised before the magistrate is not preserved for this court's review). AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.