From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenspan v. Matrix Capital Grp.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
May 18, 2022
3:21-cv-01018-JR (D. Or. May. 18, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-01018-JR

05-18-2022

RONALD F. GREENSPAN, in his capacity as COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER for the RECEIVERSHIP ENTITY, including AEQUITAS COMMERCIAL FINANCE, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, and CAREPAYMENT, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. MATRIX CAPITAL GROUP, INC., a New York corporation; and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on April 28, 2022, in which she recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion for default judgment. F&R, ECF 19. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation [19].

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is granted [16].

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Greenspan v. Matrix Capital Grp.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
May 18, 2022
3:21-cv-01018-JR (D. Or. May. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Greenspan v. Matrix Capital Grp.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD F. GREENSPAN, in his capacity as COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER for the…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: May 18, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-01018-JR (D. Or. May. 18, 2022)