Opinion
July 28, 1986
Appeal from the Court of Claims (McCabe, J.).
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
It is undisputed that the State vacated the premises which it leased from the claimant on April 21, 1983. The claimant was aware that the premises had been vacated by 10:00 A.M. the next morning, April 22, 1983. Accordingly, the premises were under the claimant's control and available for inspection on that date.
Pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (4), any claim for breach of contract must be filed within six months after the accrual of such claim. It is well settled that the filing requirements of Court of Claims Act § 10 are jurisdictional in nature and must be strictly construed (see, Lurie v State of New York, 73 A.D.2d 1006, affd 52 N.Y.2d 849; Bommarito v State of New York, 35 A.D.2d 458). Thus, if the filing is not timely, the claim is subject to dismissal. The expression "claim accrues" is synonymous with "damages accrue", and a claim accrues when damages are ascertainable (see, Bronxville Palmer v State of New York, 36 A.D.2d 647; Dufel v State of New York, 198 App. Div. 97, 102; see also, Otis Elevator Co. v State of New York, 52 A.D.2d 380).
In the instant case, the claimant could have determined its damages as of April 22, 1983. The fact that the claimant, for one reason or another, chose not to ascertain its damages at that time is irrelevant. Its claim is time barred since more than six months had passed at the time of filing (see, Heritage Corp. v New York State Thruway Auth., 44 A.D.2d 869). Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.