From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenkeepers, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 29, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-3747 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2009)

Summary

requiring parties to "exchange all documents containing underlying records which may be relevant on the topic of amount of damages, such as sales records and financial statements" even though plaintiff had not disclosed damages theory it intended to pursue

Summary of this case from Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-3747.

October 29, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of October 2009, the Motion to Compel of Defendants Nike, Inc. and MacNeill Engineering Company, Inc. (Docket No. 75) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, in accordance with the foregoing Memorandum.


Summaries of

Greenkeepers, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 29, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-3747 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2009)

requiring parties to "exchange all documents containing underlying records which may be relevant on the topic of amount of damages, such as sales records and financial statements" even though plaintiff had not disclosed damages theory it intended to pursue

Summary of this case from Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc.
Case details for

Greenkeepers, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GREENKEEPERS, INC. and GREENKEEPERS OF DELAWARE, LLC v. NIKE, INC. and…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 29, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-3747 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc.

However, defendant fails to explain how such a refusal bears on the issue of relevance under Rule 26(b)(1).…