From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenfield v. Denner

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1959
6 N.Y.2d 867 (N.Y. 1959)

Opinion

Argued April 7, 1959

Decided May 29, 1959

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, EDGAR J. NATHAN, JR., J.

Joseph Calderon for appellant-respondent.

George Trosk for Harry B. Denner and Irving Mehler, respondents-appellants. Isidor Schlesinger and Samuel Bushwick for Sidney Nitchun, Meyer A. Berkowitz and Mason Neckwear Co., Inc., respondents-appellants.


Orders of Appellate Division reversed and those of Special Term reinstated, as follows: The first cause of action is dismissed for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division; the defense of laches and estoppel is stricken from the amended answers to the second cause of action upon the ground that it is insufficient in law. Questions certified Nos. 1 and 4 answered in the negative; questions Nos. 2 and 3 not answered. No opinion.

Concur: Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD and VAN VOORHIS. Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges FROESSEL and BURKE dissent and vote to affirm the order of the Appellate Division holding the first cause of action sufficient.


Summaries of

Greenfield v. Denner

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1959
6 N.Y.2d 867 (N.Y. 1959)
Case details for

Greenfield v. Denner

Case Details

Full title:HARRY GREENFIELD, Individually and on Behalf of CLERMONT CRAVAT COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1959

Citations

6 N.Y.2d 867 (N.Y. 1959)
188 N.Y.S.2d 986
160 N.E.2d 118

Citing Cases

Rossi v. Kelly

To the extent that causes of action may exist against Lawson and CCDC for wrongfully inducing Kelly to breach…

Corso v. Byron

(b)ut allegations of mismanagement or diversion of assets by officers or directors to their own enrichment,…