From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenfield v. Beaver

Supreme Court, Kings Special Term
Jan 1, 1900
30 Misc. 366 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1900)

Opinion

January, 1900.

James Burke, jr., for motion.

George J. Greenfield opposed.


The owner purported to be assessed for this land each year on the resident list. The tax levied pursuant thereto was not and could not be against the land, but only against the owner. Each year's tax if not collected of the owner could be assessed the next year against the land itself after the manner of assessing nonresident lands (Tax Law, § 89). In that way only could a lien be acquired on the land for the tax. That has not been done in this case, and the time when it could have been done has passed. Hence these taxes are not liens against the land, and therefore are not for the referee to pay. Section 65 of the village charter permits the trustees of the village to lease lands for unpaid taxes, but only for such taxes as are "a lien upon a lot". The way to get such lien has already been pointed out, the general tax law being made applicable by a provision of such charter. That way not having been pursued, there is no lien on the land, and hence no power in the trustees to lease.

The motion is denied.


Summaries of

Greenfield v. Beaver

Supreme Court, Kings Special Term
Jan 1, 1900
30 Misc. 366 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1900)
Case details for

Greenfield v. Beaver

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE J. GREENFIELD, as Trustee, Plaintiff, v . MARY J. BEAVER et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Kings Special Term

Date published: Jan 1, 1900

Citations

30 Misc. 366 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1900)
62 N.Y.S. 471

Citing Cases

Tysen v. City of New York

An attack upon the validity of the tax entry, if any, could be made by the debtor, but not by these…

Matter of Bodine

It was not, however, until 1896, that the Legislature used any words that even suggested a lien (see Laws of…