From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greene v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Jan 21, 2020
CIVIL ACTION 3:19-3312-MGL-SVH (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 3:19-3312-MGL-SVH

01-21-2020

LATOREY J. GREENE SR., Plaintiff, v. KEN YOUNG, JR., PATRICK WRIGHT, CASEY DALE CORNWELL, JACK HOWLE, DANIEL GOURLEY, W. HARRY CONNOR, JR., SUSAN MAYES, CHARLES BROOKS III and KELLY JACKSON, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT ISSUANCE AND SERVICE OF PROCESS

Plaintiff Latorey J. Greene Sr. (Greene) filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He is self represented.

The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting this case be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report January 2, 2020, but Greene failed to file any objections. "[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must 'only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.'" Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 21st day of January, 2020, in Columbia, South Carolina.

s/ Mary Geiger Lewis

MARY GEIGER LEWIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

*****

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

Greene is hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within thirty days from the date hereof, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Greene v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Jan 21, 2020
CIVIL ACTION 3:19-3312-MGL-SVH (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Greene v. Young

Case Details

Full title:LATOREY J. GREENE SR., Plaintiff, v. KEN YOUNG, JR., PATRICK WRIGHT, CASEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 21, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 3:19-3312-MGL-SVH (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2020)