From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greene v. Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jul 23, 2019
Civil Action No. 19-1924 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jul. 23, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 19-1924 (UNA)

07-23-2019

LAUREN GREENE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se civil complaint. The Court is mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

The plaintiff's long and rambling pleading recounts her education and professional history, treatment for mental disorders, arrests, involuntary hospitalizations, and alleged involvement with the CIA. Missing from the complaint are statements regarding this Court's jurisdiction and the plaintiff's entitlement to the relief she demands, including revision of rules to make her eligible for rehire in the Philadelphia public schools, correction of records maintained by Pennsylvania state police, and firing employees of the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Furthermore, the complaint fails to put any defendant on notice of the claim(s) the plaintiff raises against it. Because the complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a), the Court will dismiss it without prejudice.

An Order is issued separately. DATE: July 23, 2019

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Greene v. Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jul 23, 2019
Civil Action No. 19-1924 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jul. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Greene v. Pennsylvania

Case Details

Full title:LAUREN GREENE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jul 23, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 19-1924 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jul. 23, 2019)