From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greene v. Mullis

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
May 9, 2022
Civil Action 3:17-CV-00638-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. May. 9, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:17-CV-00638-RJC-DSC

05-09-2022

MICHAEL LEE GREENE, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN R. MULLIS et. al., Defendants.


ORDER

David S. Cayer, United States Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff's “Motion for Scheduling Order and Motion for the Appointment of Counsel” (document # 89).

The parties recently participated in a PSAP mediation which resulted in an impasse. See document #88. The Clerk's office has issued a Notice directing the parties to conduct the Initial Attorney's Conference.

Plaintiff cites no applicable authority supporting his request for court appointed counsel in a civil case. Moreover, the Court is not aware of any case law, statute, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, or Local Rule requiring the appointment of counsel in a civil case such as the one brought by Plaintiff, and no funds have been appropriated for that purpose.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's “Motion for Scheduling Order and Motion for the Appointment of Counsel” (document # 89) is DENIED.

2. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff, to defense counsel, and to the Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Jr.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Greene v. Mullis

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
May 9, 2022
Civil Action 3:17-CV-00638-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. May. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Greene v. Mullis

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LEE GREENE, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN R. MULLIS et. al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: May 9, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:17-CV-00638-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. May. 9, 2022)