From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greene v. Gorcoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 30, 1958
5 A.D.2d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

April 30, 1958

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.


Order of Onondaga County Court and judgments of Syracuse Municipal Court reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted in Syracuse Municipal Court with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The Trial Judge erred in requiring plaintiff to elect whether to proceed in contract or in fraud, particularly after the parties had opened to the jury. The two theories are neither inconsistent nor mutually exclusive. Much of the proof is common to both and plaintiff was seriously prejudiced in not being permitted to submit them together. This error permeated and prejudiced both causes of action to such an extent that the plaintiff is entitled to a new trial upon the entire complaint. All concur.


Summaries of

Greene v. Gorcoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 30, 1958
5 A.D.2d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Greene v. Gorcoff

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH GREENE, Doing Business as K. GREENE REAL ESTATE, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 30, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)