From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greene v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 20, 2019
Case No. 3:18 CV 1507 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 20, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:18 CV 1507

09-20-2019

Michael D. Greene, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Michael Greene seeks disability-related Social Security benefits. He applied for benefits in 2014 (Doc. 10 at 206, 213), but a state agency twice denied the applications (id. at 148, 151, 156, 159). Greene then appealed, unsuccessfully, to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) (id. at 33-34). Another adjudicator -- the Social Security Appeals Council -- declined to review the ALJ's decision (id. at 6). Greene now asks this Court to award him benefits or to order that the ALJ reconsider his applications (Doc. 1 at 2).

The matter was automatically referred to Magistrate Judge James Knepp under Local Civil Rule 72.2(b)(1) (Non-Doc. Entry 7/5/2018). In a Report and Recommendation (R&R), Judge Knepp affirmed the denial of Greene's applications (Doc. 16 at 1). Greene objects (Doc. 18-1); Defendant Commissioner of Social Security responds (Doc. 19). This Court reviews the Objection de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

Greene claims entitlement to benefits based on mental and physical impairments (Doc. 10 at 241, 249). His Objection concerns the mental impairments. On step two of the required five-step analysis, see 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(a)(4), the ALJ determined that the mental impairments are not severe (Doc. 10 at 26). Judge Knepp concluded that this determination is not reversible error (Doc. 16 at 10). Greene insists it is (Doc. 18-1 at 2, 7), but he is mistaken. Even if the mental impairments are severe, the ALJ's erroneous determination to the contrary is harmless because he (1) found other severe impairments on step two (Doc. 10 at 24) and (2) considered the mental impairments when defining Greene's "residual functional capacity" on step four (id. at 26, 30, 32). See Pompa v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 73 F. App'x 801, 803 (6th Cir. 2003).

The Objection (Doc. 18-1) is overruled, the R&R (Doc. 16) is adopted, and Greene's Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jack Zouhary

JACK ZOUHARY

U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

September 20, 2019


Summaries of

Greene v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 20, 2019
Case No. 3:18 CV 1507 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Greene v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Michael D. Greene, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 20, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:18 CV 1507 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 20, 2019)