From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greene v. Castro

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 29, 2006
No. CIV S-04-1983 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1983 FCD KJM P.

August 29, 2006


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed May 2, 2006, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. On June 20, 2006 plaintiff was granted a thirty day extension of time. The time granted to plaintiff within which to file an amended complaint has expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Greene v. Castro

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 29, 2006
No. CIV S-04-1983 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Greene v. Castro

Case Details

Full title:MARVELLOUS A. GREENE, SR., Plaintiff, v. CASTRO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 29, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-04-1983 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)