Greenbaum v. Clarksville Health Sys., G.P.

1 Citing case

  1. Universal Inst. v. Humphries

    21-cv-16066-ES-ESK (D.N.J. Jun. 28, 2022)

    My recommended resolution of granting remand in this instance is consistent with similar rulings in other district courts. See, e.g., Greenbaum v. Clarksville Health Sys., G.P., No. 21-00030, 2021 WL 1816901, at *4 (M.D. Tenn. May 6, 2021) (remanding an action brought by patients attacking a medical provider's assertion of liens for treatment provided to those patients instead of first billing Medicare, because the claims “do not require the Court to resolve any disputed questions under the Medicare Act”); Regents for Univ. of Calif. v. UnitedHealthcare Ins. Co., No. 12-00588, 2012 WL 4471416, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2012) (remanding an action brought by a hospital against an insurer over reimbursements where Medicare was the primary payer, because “resolution of Medicare issues [wa]s not required”)