Opinion
2:23-cv-00812-CDS-NJK
08-03-2023
LEAH MARTIN, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 7982 KEVIN HEJMANOWSKI, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 10612 LEAH MARTIN LAW ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT JOSHUA A. SIPERA LAW OFFICES OF CRAIG B. FRIEDBERG, ESQ CRAIG B. FRIEDBERG, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF, MITZI GREENAN
LEAH MARTIN, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 7982
KEVIN HEJMANOWSKI, ESQ.
NEVADA BAR NO. 10612
LEAH MARTIN LAWATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT JOSHUA A. SIPERA
LAW OFFICES OF CRAIG B. FRIEDBERG, ESQ
CRAIG B. FRIEDBERG, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF, MITZI GREENAN
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [ECF. 1]
(FIRST REQUEST)
Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1 of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, Defendant, Joshua A. Sipera (hereinafter “Defendant”), and Plaintiff, Mitzi Greenan (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed a Complaint on May 24, 2023.
2. Defendant was served on June 30, 2023 [ECF 10].
3. Defendant's deadline to file an answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint is on or around July 21, 2023.
4. Plaintiff's Counsel consented to an extension through August 14, 2023, for Defendant to respond to the Complaint.
5. This is Defendant's first request for an extension to respond to the Complaint.
6. The extension is not being asserted to cause undue delay or burden to the parties.
7. Due to Defendant's recent retention of counsel, Defendant submits that good cause exists for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b).
8. The parties stipulate and agree that Defendant shall have up to and including August 14, 2023, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the Complaint.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Docket No. 11 is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.