From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Tex. Parole Bd.

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Mar 23, 2022
3:21-cv-3190-K-BN (N.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-3190-K-BN

03-23-2022

LOWELL QUINCY GREEN TDCJ No. 00518622, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS PAROLE BOARD, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ED KINKEADE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff has since filed three documents. See Doc. Nos. 7-9. It is unclear what the nature of these filings is. None of the documents appears to be an objection to the findings of the Magistrate Judge, although one does order him to recuse or face “treason.” See Doc. No. 8. Liberally construing these three filings as objections to the findings of the Magistrate Judge, the District Court has conducted a de novo of the findings, conclusions, and recommendation. Finding no error on de novo 1 review, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED. 2


Summaries of

Green v. Tex. Parole Bd.

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Mar 23, 2022
3:21-cv-3190-K-BN (N.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Green v. Tex. Parole Bd.

Case Details

Full title:LOWELL QUINCY GREEN TDCJ No. 00518622, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS PAROLE BOARD…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-3190-K-BN (N.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2022)

Citing Cases

Green v. Pitman

Numerous courts have recognized Green's three-strike status and dismissed on that basis when he failed to…

Green v. Clarke

Numerous courts have recognized Green's three-strike status and dismissed on that basis when he failed to…