From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jul 16, 2019
275 So. 3d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D18-1281

07-16-2019

Michael GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Michael Green, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Michael Green, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In his petition for habeas corpus, the appellant attempts to collaterally attack his judgments and sentences for the third time. The trial court correctly determined that the appellant is not entitled to relief. A petition for habeas corpus is not available to seek collateral postconviction relief. Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236, 1242 (Fla. 2004). If we review the appellant's petition as a motion for postconviction relief, the motion is time-barred because the appellant's judgments and sentences became final more than two years prior to him filing the instant motion. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b) ; Green v. State , 169 So. 3d 1166 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (Table).

AFFIRMED .

Lewis, B.L. Thomas, and Roberts, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Green v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jul 16, 2019
275 So. 3d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Green v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jul 16, 2019

Citations

275 So. 3d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)