From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 9, 1991
583 So. 2d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2555.

August 9, 1991.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County; R. Hudson Olliff, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, David P. Gauldin, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Suzanne G. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Raising several issues, Green seeks review of his conviction and sentence for burglary of a dwelling while armed with a dangerous weapon pursuant to section 810.02(2), Florida Statutes (1989). He urges that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of that first-degree felony, that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence similar fact evidence, and that he was improperly sentenced as an habitual felony offender. Finding his first two points to be without merit, we affirm without further elaboration.

We also affirm appellant's sentence imposed pursuant to section 775.084(4)(a)1., Florida Statutes (1989). Appellant argues that because he was convicted of a first-degree felony punishable by a term of years not to exceed life, the habitual felony offender statute does not apply. He cites this court's recent decision in Gholston v. State, 16 F.L.W. D46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). However, since Gholston, we have considered the issue en banc, and have receded from Gholston, in Burdick v. State, 584 So.2d 1035 (1991). Nonetheless, as we did in Burdick, we certify the following question as one of great public importance:

IS A FIRST-DEGREE FELONY PUNISHABLE BY A TERM OF YEARS NOT EXCEEDING LIFE IMPRISONMENT SUBJECT TO AN ENHANCED SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE HABITUAL FELONY OFFENDER STATUTE?

AFFIRMED.

CAWTHON, Senior Judge, concurs.

ERVIN, J., concurs and dissents with opinion.


I concur in all aspects of the majority's opinion except that relating to the life sentence imposed upon appellant as a habitual felony offender. As to that issue, I dissent for the same reasons expressed in my dissent in Burdick v. State, 584 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (en banc). I concur, however, with the majority in the certified question.


Summaries of

Green v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 9, 1991
583 So. 2d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Green v. State

Case Details

Full title:KING ANTHONY GREEN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 9, 1991

Citations

583 So. 2d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Mixon v. State

Moreover, we have recently receded from Gholston in Burdick v. State, 584 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (en…

Green v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review Green v. State, 583 So.2d 796, 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), in which the district…