From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct 23, 2012
383 S.W.3d 68 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97817.

2012-10-23

Kerry GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge. Danelle C. Duffy, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jennifer A. Wideman, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.
Danelle C. Duffy, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jennifer A. Wideman, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Kerry Green (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief because his trial counsel was ineffective for numerous reasons.

We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Green v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct 23, 2012
383 S.W.3d 68 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Green v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kerry GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

383 S.W.3d 68 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)