In addition, the victim testified that at the time of her attack she was on the streets identified by the Pine Lake police officer as being in DeKalb County. This enumeration of error lacks merit. See Green v. State, 254 Ga. App. 549, 550 ( 562 SE2d 835) (2002). 6. Works asserts the trial court erred in failing to merge the aggravated assault and aggravated battery convictions.
We now consider, in turn, each of those acts for which J. S. was adjudicated delinquent. Green v. State, 254 Ga. App. 549, 550 ( 562 SE2d 835) (2002). (a) Attempt to commit burglary.
(Footnote omitted.) Green v. State, 254 Ga. App. 549, 550 ( 562 SE2d 835) (2002). Even though the children's testimony was not entirely consistent and they could not remember some of the details surrounding the acts of molestation, particularly those that occurred when they were very young, the jury is solely responsible for judging the credibility of the witnesses, even on the issue of venue.
See Payne, supra, 290 Ga. App. at 591 (2); Green v. State.Green v. State, 254 Ga. App. 549, 550 ( 562 SE2d 835) (2002). 3.
King v. State, 271 Ga. App. 384, 387 (1) ( 609 SE2d 725) (2005).Green v. State, 254 Ga. App. 549, 550 ( 562 SE2d 835) (2002).Cortez v. State, 286 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) (a) ( 648 SE2d 488) (2007).
Moody v. State, 279 Ga. App. 457, 459 ( 631 SE2d 473) (2006).Green v. State, 254 Ga. App. 549, 550 ( 562 SE2d 835) (2002). 2. Boyd contends that the court should have merged the two aggravated assault convictions on the ground that they were all part of Boyd's day-long scheme of attempting to rape the daughter.
Olarte v. State, 273 Ga. App. 96 (1) ( 614 SE2d 213) (2005).Green v. State, 254 Ga. App. 549, 550 ( 562 SE2d 835) (2002). The victim testified that except for an incident in Michigan, all of the incidents of molestation that she described for the jury had occurred in Gwinnett County. The jury was authorized to find that testimony to be credible.
As thus recognized in Green v. State, "since venue is a question for the jury, its decision will not be set aside if there is any evidence to support it." 254 Ga. App. 549 ( 562 SE2d 835) (2002).King v. State, supra at 385 (1) (footnotes omitted), citing Green v. State, supra.
The witness, after examining a map, testified that the Coast Guard vessel found the Star One in Chatham County. Given this testimony and the evidence showing that members of the Coast Guard boarded the Star One shortly after the victim was raped, the jury was entitled to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the rape occurred in Chatham County. See Green v. State, 254 Ga. App. 549, 549-550 ( 562 SE2d 835) (2002) (venue is a question for the jury, and testimony confirming crime's location was sufficient to prove venue beyond a reasonable doubt). 3. Nguyen claims that the trial court erred in failing to give a sua sponte jury instruction as to venue.
OCGA ยง 17-2-2 (a). See Green v. State, 254 Ga. App. 549, 550 ( 562 SE2d 835) (2002). 6. Lastly, Henry argues that the trial court erred by failing to recharge the jury that his statements or character witnesses could create reasonable doubt after they asked to review the videotaped interview of the victim and to rehear the instruction on reasonable doubt.