From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 26, 2002
810 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

holding that the window period for challenging the enhanced sentencing provisions created by chapter 95-182 is from October 1, 1995, to May 24, 1997

Summary of this case from Kinsey v. State

Opinion

No. 1D01-2704.

March 26, 2002.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Kim A. Skievaski, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The appellant challenges the trial court's summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The appellant claims that his sentence for the life felony of second-degree murder with a firearm was enhanced improperly under the habitual violent felony offender statute. The appellant's sentence was enhanced pursuant to amendments to the habitual violent felony offender statute enacted by Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida. Chapter 95-182 was declared unconstitutional as violative of the single-subject rule. See State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643, 649 (Fla. 1999). The appellant's offense date fell between October 1, 1995, and May 24, 1997, the window period for challenging the violent career criminal sentencing provisions created by chapter 95-182. See Salters v. State, 758 So.2d 667, 671 (Fla. 2000). Thus, the enhancement of the appellant's life felony under the habitual violent felony offender statute is improper. See Woodson v. State, 777 So.2d 1167, 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), citing Everett v. State, 770 So.2d 192, 193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). As conceded by the state, the appellant should be resentenced for the life felony conviction pursuant to the laws that were in effect at the time of his offense. We accordingly reverse the order summarily denying this claim and remand for the trial court to resentence the appellant on his conviction for second-degree murder with a firearm. The appellant's remaining convictions, which were not life felonies, are unaffected by this decision.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

BOOTH, WOLF and LEWIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Green v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 26, 2002
810 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

holding that the window period for challenging the enhanced sentencing provisions created by chapter 95-182 is from October 1, 1995, to May 24, 1997

Summary of this case from Kinsey v. State
Case details for

Green v. State

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN U. GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 26, 2002

Citations

810 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Kinsey v. State

The imposition of a habitual felony offender sentence for a life felony can be challenged under the authority…

Johnson v. State

As the State confesses, the Defendant should be re-sentenced for the life felony in count three pursuant to…