Opinion
21-1036 21-1047 21-1048
07-22-2021
DARYL A. GREEN, Debtor - Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT; PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, Creditors - Appellees, and . TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee. DARYL ANTHONY GREEN, Debtor - Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT, Creditor - Appellee, and TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee. No. 21-1048 DARYL ANTHONY GREEN, Debtor - Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT, Creditor -Appellee, and TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee.
Daryl A. Green, Appellant Pro Se. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Karen Hess Rohrbaugh, Assistant Attorney General,
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: July 20, 2021
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:20-cv-01201-TDC; 8:19-cv-03449-TDC; 8:20-cv-01765-TDC)
Daryl A. Green, Appellant Pro Se. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Karen Hess Rohrbaugh, Assistant Attorney General,
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Daryl A. Green appeals from the district court's order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his separate appeals from the bankruptcy court's orders: (1) denying without prejudice his motion to compel discovery (No. 21-1036); (2) denying his motion to dismiss the Creditor's proof of claim (No. 21-1047); and (3) denying his motion to dismiss the Creditor's motion to dismiss his bankruptcy case (No. 21-1048). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. Prince George's Cnty. Ofc. of Child Support Enf't, Nos. 8:20-cv-01201-TDC, 8:19-cv-3449-TDC, 8:20-cv-01765-TDC (D. Md. Dec. 23, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.