From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Price

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Mar 12, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-0105-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Mar. 12, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-0105-KD-N.

March 12, 2010


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court with the following amendment:

the final two sentences of the first full paragraph on page 5 of the report and recommendation ("Green thus had until February 27, 2008, to timely file his appeal denying his Rule 35 petition. He did not do so, and thus his one-year filing period began to run again on that date.") is deleted and replaced with "Petitioner's one-year limitation period began to run again on February 14, 2008.

It is ORDERED that Green's habeas petition is DISMISSED with prejudice as time barred.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Green v. Price

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Mar 12, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-0105-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Mar. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Green v. Price

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. GREEN, Petitioner, v. CHERYL PRICE, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Mar 12, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-0105-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Mar. 12, 2010)