From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Maroules

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 27, 2009
328 F. App'x 868 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-1051.

Submitted: July 23, 2009.

Decided: July 27, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:04-cv-00111-H).

Georgia A. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Dal Floyd Wooten, III, Kinston, North Carolina; Kari Russwurm Johnson, Cranfill, Sumner Hartzog, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Georgia A. Green appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. Maroules, No. 4:04-cv-00111-H (E.D.N.C. June 4, 2007; Sept. 2, 2008, Oct. 31, 2008, Nov. 5, 2008, Dec. 1, 2008 Jan. 5, 2009). We deny Green's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Green v. Maroules

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 27, 2009
328 F. App'x 868 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Green v. Maroules

Case Details

Full title:Georgia A. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher MAROULES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 27, 2009

Citations

328 F. App'x 868 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

White v. City of Greensboro

Because this motion advances the same arguments as the previous motion, response and reply briefs are not…

Manning v. N.C. State Univ.

Congress has not adopted a specific statute of limitations for actions under Title II of the ADA and Section…