Opinion
2:20-cv-00769-KJD-DJA
10-11-2023
KEYHERRA GREEN, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; FRED MERRICK; LORA CODY; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.
PETER GOLDSTEIN LAW CORP Peter Goldstein MALCOLM P. LAVERGNE & ASSOC. Malcolm P. LaVergne Attorneys for Plaintiff KAEMPFER CROWELL Lyssa S. Anderson Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Fred Merrtek, and Lora Cody.
PETER GOLDSTEIN LAW CORP Peter Goldstein MALCOLM P. LAVERGNE & ASSOC. Malcolm P. LaVergne Attorneys for Plaintiff
KAEMPFER CROWELL Lyssa S. Anderson Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Fred Merrtek, and Lora Cody.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINES FOR REPLIES TO OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST)
Plaintiff, Keyherra Green (“Plaintiff') and Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Fred Merrick and Lora Cody (“LVMPD Defendants”), and by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate, agree, and request that this Court extend the response deadlines for Plaintiff to reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion For Partial Summary Judgment and for Defendants to reply to Plaintiffs Consolidated Opposition to Defendants' Two Motions for Summary Judgment from the current date of October 19, 2023 up to and including November 17, 2023.
This request for an extension is based on the plaintiff's and defendants' counsels' deposition schedules in several other civil rights cases pending in United States court in the southern district of Nevada as well deposition schedules with respect to witnesses and parties in another case between the same lawyers, Mary Smith v LVMPD, Wellpath.
This request for an extension is made in good faith and joined by all the parties in this case. The extension will not delay the proceedings but will allow the parties the necessary time to litigate the case and adequately oppose the respective dispositive motions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.