From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Larkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 28, 2018
Civ. No. 3:17-cv-01186-TC (D. Or. Jun. 28, 2018)

Opinion

Civ. No. 3:17-cv-01186-TC

06-28-2018

KELLY FOSTON GREEN, Plaintiff, v. SGT. LARKIN, Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 22), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) is adopted. This action is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 28th day of June, 2018.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Green v. Larkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 28, 2018
Civ. No. 3:17-cv-01186-TC (D. Or. Jun. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Green v. Larkin

Case Details

Full title:KELLY FOSTON GREEN, Plaintiff, v. SGT. LARKIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 28, 2018

Citations

Civ. No. 3:17-cv-01186-TC (D. Or. Jun. 28, 2018)