Summary
holding that plaintiff who elected to proceed pro se at criminal trial could not later complain about adequacy of access to legal reference materials
Summary of this case from Daker v. FerreroOpinion
CV 605-129.
June 29, 2006
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendants Muldrew and SCSD are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's claims regarding his "selective prosecution," harms to other inmates, pretrial bond, medical care, meals, legal mail, retaliation, and access to legal materials are also DISMISSED as incognizable.
SO ORDERED.