From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Goldy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 21, 2012
2:10-cv-00162-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2012)

Opinion


JOHN K. GREEN, Plaintiff, v. C.O. GOLDY, Defendant. No. 2:10-cv-00162-GEB-DAD United States District Court, E.D. California. March 21, 2012

          ORDER

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.

         All parties have consented to have trial in this action conducted by the Magistrate Judge. See ECF No. 4, and ECF No. 63, 5:8.

         If the Magistrate Judge accepts the referral, this action is reassigned to the Magistrate Judge on the date this Order is filed, and any matter scheduled before the undersigned District Court Judge is vacated. See Local Rule 305(b) (prescribing "notwithstanding the consent of all parties, the [United States District] Judge or Magistrate Judge may reject the referral.").


Summaries of

Green v. Goldy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 21, 2012
2:10-cv-00162-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Green v. Goldy

Case Details

Full title:JOHN K. GREEN, Plaintiff, v. C.O. GOLDY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 21, 2012

Citations

2:10-cv-00162-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2012)