From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Franklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 29, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-2292 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-2292

08-29-2017

DARRON D. GREEN, Plaintiff v. FELICIA FRANKLIN, et al., Defendants


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 10) of Chief Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab, issued following comprehensive review of the complaint (Doc. 1) of pro se plaintiff Darron D. Green ("Green"), wherein Judge Schwab recommends that the court dismiss Green's complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted, and that dismissal should be without leave to amend in view of Green's failure to comply with the court's requirement that he maintain a current address with the Clerk of Court, (see id. at 6-8), and it appearing that no party has objected to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d t 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following independent review of the record, the court being in full agreement with Judge Schwab's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 10) of Magistrate Judge Schwab is ADOPTED.

2. Green's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

4. Any appeal from this order is deemed to be frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Green v. Franklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 29, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-2292 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Green v. Franklin

Case Details

Full title:DARRON D. GREEN, Plaintiff v. FELICIA FRANKLIN, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 29, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-2292 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2017)