From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. NASA Dir.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dec 2, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-02387 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2016)

Opinion

Case: 1:16-cv-02387

12-02-2016

ANTHONY SPENCER GREEN, SR., Plaintiff, v. NASA DIRECTOR, Defendant.


Assigned To : Unassigned
Assign. Date : 12/7/2016
Description: Pro Se Gen. Civil (F Deck) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint.

According to plaintiff, defendant is responsible for the installation of a device in his left ear through which NASA monitors his activities. See Compl. at 3 (page numbers designated by the Court). In addition, plaintiff alleges that a second procedure was performed at a military hospital to install hardware "that can record & repeat everything" plaintiff thinks and speaks at all times. Id. at 4. Plaintiff did not consent to either procedure, and he since has received no compensation, even though bank accounts have been opened in plaintiff's name. See id. at 3, 4. For alleged violations of his constitutionally protected rights, plaintiff demands "programs money & all [his] bank accounts in [his] po[s]ession & payments of . . . . $100,000,000." Id. at 5.

The trial court has the discretion to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such finding is appropriate when the facts alleged are irrational or wholly incredible. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992); see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) ("[A] complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions, is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact."). Having reviewed the complaint, the Court concludes that what factual contentions are identifiable are baseless and wholly incredible. Therefore, the Court will dismiss the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as frivolous.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. DATE: December 2, 2016

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Green v. NASA Dir.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dec 2, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-02387 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Green v. NASA Dir.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SPENCER GREEN, SR., Plaintiff, v. NASA DIRECTOR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Dec 2, 2016

Citations

Case: 1:16-cv-02387 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2016)