From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Coleman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 29, 2016
Civil Action No. 2: 15-cv-155 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2: 15-cv-155

09-29-2016

MUWSA GREEN, Plaintiff v. BRIAN A. COLEMAN, et al., Defendants


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pending before the Court is DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (ECF No. 53). The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules of Court for Magistrate Judges.

The magistrate judge filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on August 18, 2016 (ECF No. 61), in which she recommended that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants be granted in part and denied in part. To wit, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the motion should be granted as to Plaintiff's due process claims against Defendants Cross, Debra Hawkinberry, Lt. Hawkinberry, Buzas, Parker, Ivey, and Harbough; and denied as to (i) Plaintiff's claims of retaliation against Defendants Buzas, Linderman, Beveridge, Burton, Wentzel, Parker, Ivey, Harbough, and Cross; and (ii) Plaintiff's supervisory claims against Defendant Coleman.

Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on August 29, 2016 (ECF No. 62), and a motion for leave to file a supplemental objection to the R&R on September 1, 2016 (ECF No. 63). The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's motion and will construe the argumentation set forth in the filing as Plaintiff's "supplemental objection."

After de novo review of the Complaint and the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, together with the R&R and Plaintiff's objection and supplemental objection thereto, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge properly analyzed each of Plaintiff's claims, and none of Plaintiff's objections have any merit. Accordingly, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2016:

IT IS ORDERED that DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (ECF No. 53) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation filed August 18, 2016, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

BY THE COURT

s/ Terrence F. Mcverry

Senior District Court Judge cc: MUWSA GREEN

HV-5362

SCI Greene

175 Progress Drive

Waynesburg, PA 15370

PRO SE

Yana L. Warshafsky, Esq.

Email: ywarshafsky@attorneygeneral.gov


Summaries of

Green v. Coleman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 29, 2016
Civil Action No. 2: 15-cv-155 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Green v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:MUWSA GREEN, Plaintiff v. BRIAN A. COLEMAN, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 29, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 2: 15-cv-155 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

Drummond v. Angelucci

Such conduct hardly suggests that Hill acquiesced in Copes's unconstitutional conduct. Cf. Green v. Coleman,…