From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Brownlee

U.S.
Oct 4, 2004
543 U.S. 913 (2004)

Summary

dismissing Privacy Act claims as time barred when plaintiff filed suit in 2001, but knew (or should have known) of alleged errors in his military record since 1981 "when he first sought to have his discharge upgraded"

Summary of this case from Jarrell v. Army Review Bds. Agency

Opinion

No. 04-5914.

October 4, 2004.


Certiorari Denied. (See also No. 03-10259, supra.).

C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 94 Fed. Appx. 902.


Summaries of

Green v. Brownlee

U.S.
Oct 4, 2004
543 U.S. 913 (2004)

dismissing Privacy Act claims as time barred when plaintiff filed suit in 2001, but knew (or should have known) of alleged errors in his military record since 1981 "when he first sought to have his discharge upgraded"

Summary of this case from Jarrell v. Army Review Bds. Agency
Case details for

Green v. Brownlee

Case Details

Full title:GREEN v. BROWNLEE, ACTING SECRETARY OF THE ARMY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 4, 2004

Citations

543 U.S. 913 (2004)
125 S. Ct. 235

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Department of Justice

The filing of this civil action in 2007 occurred more than two years later, after the statute of limitations…

Jarrell v. Army Review Bds. Agency

Jarrell v. Nat'l Pers. Records Ctr., No. 3:11-CV-434, 2013 WL 5346483, at *8 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 23, 2013),…