From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Anderson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 29, 1994
26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-15306.

Argued and Submitted April 13, 1994.

Decided April 29, 1994. Amended June 13, 1994.

Theodore Garelis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for defendants-appellants.

Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: GOODWIN, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court's order. Green v. Anderson, 811 F. Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal. 1993). This panel will retain jurisdiction over the case.

This Court's Order, filed April 29, 1994, is hereby corrected by inserting the words "the preliminary injunction" between "AFFIRM" and "for."

The April 29, 1994 Order is redesignated ORDER FOR PUBLICATION.


Summaries of

Green v. Anderson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 29, 1994
26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir. 1994)
Case details for

Green v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:DESHAWN GREEN, DEBBY VENTURELLA, AND DIANA P. BERTOLLT, ON BEHALF OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 29, 1994

Citations

26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Saenz v. Roe

The Court of Appeals summarily affirmed for the reasons stated by the District Judge. Green v. Anderson, 26…

Roe v. Anderson

The district court relied on a line of Supreme Court cases addressing durational residency provisions in a…