From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greathouse v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 10, 2005
No. 03-04-00419-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 10, 2005)

Opinion

No. 03-04-00419-CR

Filed: March 10, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the District Court of Travis County, 403rd Judicial District, No. 2031335, Honorable Brenda Kennedy, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

Before Justices B.A. SMITH, PURYEAR and PEMBERTON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


A jury found appellant Todd Greathouse guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at forty years' imprisonment. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 29.03 (West 2003). Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by demonstrating that the only arguable contentions that might support the appeal are ultimately without merit. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Greathouse v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 10, 2005
No. 03-04-00419-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 10, 2005)
Case details for

Greathouse v. State

Case Details

Full title:TODD GREATHOUSE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Mar 10, 2005

Citations

No. 03-04-00419-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 10, 2005)