From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greathouse v. Greathouse

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 14, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-CV- 02271-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-CV- 02271-BNB

10-14-2011

KATHERINE CHRISTINA GREATHOUSE, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM D. GREATHOUSE, G AND H FARMS, a Colorado Corp., THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, STATE OF COLORADO, DISTRICT COURT, BACA COUNTY, COLORADO, Case Numbers 87CV36, 10CV14, 10CV18, and 10CV3, SAGE BRUSH FARMS, HORSESHOE TRUST, LAMB'S LAND LEGACY, and KOCHIA PLAINS, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Katherine Christina Greathouse, initiated this action by filing pro se a document titled "Ministerial Duties in Regard to In Personam and In Rem Final Judgment and Determination in All Cases" with the Court on August 30, 2011.

In an order filed on September 7, 2011, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland ordered Ms. Greathouse to cure certain enumerated deficiencies in this case within thirty days. Specifically, Ms. Greathouse was directed to submit a Complaint on the Court-approved form. Ms. Greathouse was also directed to file a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on the Court-approved form. She was informed that the § 1915 motion and affidavit was only necessary if the $350.00 filing fee was not paid in advance. The September 7 order warned Ms. Greathouse that if she failed to cure the designated deficiencies within the time allowed, the action would be dismissed without further notice.

On September 7, 2011, Ms. Greathouse again filed a document titled "Ministerial Duties in Regard to In Personam and In Rem Final Judgment and Determination in All Cases." Ms. Greathouse filed an identical document on September 8, 2011.

Ms. Greathouse has now failed to file a Complaint and a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 as directed by the September 7 Order. Further, she has not communicated with the Court since September 8, 2011. Therefore, Ms. Greathouse has failed within the time allowed to cure the designated deficiencies. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the failure of Plaintiff, Katherine Christina Greathouse, to comply with the order to cure dated September 7, 2011. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot.

BY THE COURT:

LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Senior Judge, United States District Court

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

Katherine Christina Greathouse

27977 County Rd 51

Walsh, CO 81090

I hereby certify that I have mailed a copy of the ORDER and JUDGMENT to the above-named individuals on October 14, 2011.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By: ____________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Greathouse v. Greathouse

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 14, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-CV- 02271-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Greathouse v. Greathouse

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE CHRISTINA GREATHOUSE, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM D. GREATHOUSE, G AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-CV- 02271-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 14, 2011)