From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Great Wall Acup. v. Geico Ins. Co.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 19, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52374 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

Opinion

2008-1274 Q C.

Decided November 19, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Leslie J. Purificacion, J.), entered May 9, 2008. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,718.40.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

PRESENT: WESTON, J.P., RIOS and STEINHARDT, JJ.


In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the matter went to trial on plaintiff's six claims with respect to, inter alia, the issue of the rate of reimbursement for acupuncture treatments provided by licensed acupuncturists. In its decision after trial, the Civil Court determined that, in accordance with Great Wall Acupuncture v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (16 Misc 3d 23 [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists 2007]), it was proper for defendant to use the workers' compensation fee schedule for acupuncture services performed by chiropractors to determine the amount which plaintiff was entitled to receive for the acupuncture sessions, and that the appropriate rate was $29.30 per session. Defendant had reimbursed plaintiff for two of the claims at the rate of $29.30. The Civil Court determined that plaintiff was also entitled to reimbursement on the remaining claims, two of which defendant had denied on the ground that plaintiff had failed to timely submit the claims, and two of which defendant had denied on the basis of lack of medical necessity. Accordingly, the Civil Court granted judgment to plaintiff in the sum of $322.30. However, judgment was entered on May 9, 2008 in the principal sum of $1,718.40. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

Since the judgment awarded plaintiff the full balance which it had requested, $1,718.40, plaintiff is not aggrieved thereby, and the appeal must be dismissed ( see CPLR 5511; Lowery v Lamaute , 40 AD3d 822 ).

Weston, J.P., Rios and Steinhardt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Great Wall Acup. v. Geico Ins. Co.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 19, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52374 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
Case details for

Great Wall Acup. v. Geico Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:GREAT WALL ACUPUNCTURE, P.C. a/a/o NELLY TUPAS, Appellant, v. GEICO…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 19, 2009

Citations

2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52374 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
906 N.Y.S.2d 772
901 N.Y.S.2d 899

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Sekyra v. Schmoll

It contains but one subject, which is clearly expressed in its title. Asel v. City of Jefferson, 287 Mo. 205;…