From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Great Neck Un. Free v. N.Y.S. Div. of Human

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 2003
304 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-06096

Argued March 1, 2002.

April 21, 2003.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights to dismiss a discrimination claim filed by Anna R. Mendozza, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated June 19, 2001, which, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ehrlich Frazer Feldman, Garden City, N.Y. (Jerome H. Ehrlich of counsel), for appellant.

Gina M. Lopez, Bronx, N.Y. (Michael K. Swirsky of counsel), for respondent New York State Division of Human Rights.

Somma, Zabell Associates, LLP, Farmingdale, N.Y. (Brian K. Saltz of counsel), for respondent Anna R. Mendozza.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

On April 26, 1995, Anna R. Mendozza filed a claim with the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter the DHR) claiming that she was unlawfully discriminated against by her employer, the petitioner, Great Neck Union Free School District (hereinafter the School District), based upon her age. Mendozza sought compensation for lost wages as well as for pain and suffering. Mendozza did not file a notice of claim with the School District. Nevertheless, the DHR found probable cause that discriminatory practices occurred and scheduled a hearing. The School District commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, inter alia, to compel the DHR to dismiss Mendozza's complaint based upon her failure to file a notice of claim as required by Education Law § 3813. The Supreme Court, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

The Supreme Court correctly concluded that Mendozza was not required to comply with the notice of claim provision of Education Law § 3813 as a condition precedent to pursing her administrative complaint before the DHR (see Freudenthal v. County of Nassau, 99 N.Y.2d 285).

S. MILLER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Great Neck Un. Free v. N.Y.S. Div. of Human

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 2003
304 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Great Neck Un. Free v. N.Y.S. Div. of Human

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF GREAT NECK UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, appellant, v. NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 783

Citing Cases

In re an Art. 78 Proceeding Taft v. Vill. of Newark Plann

The Board found "This application proposes a distinct change of use in the neighborhood for a residential to…