From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Great American v. Jalaram

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 27, 2006
927 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1D06-0123.

April 27, 2006.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Charles O. Mitchell, Jr., Judge.

Lee Craig and Anthony J. Russo of Butler Pappas Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP, Tampa, for Appellant.

Robert D. Fingar of Frank Gramling, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Having considered the "Appellant, Great American Insurance Company's, Motion to Determine Jurisdiction to Consider Appeal," filed on March 3, 2006, as well as the appellee's response thereto, filed on March 20, 2006, and the appellant's reply to the response, filed on March 29, 2006, the appellant's motion is hereby GRANTED. The Court finds that the order on appeal is not an appealable final order. Compare McQuaig v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 789 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), with Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Specifically, the order on appeal fails to enter judgment or otherwise provide unequivocal language of finality clearly indicating the trial court's intention to bring an end to the judicial labor below. See Monticello Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 743 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice to appellant's right to file a timely notice of appeal once a final order is rendered.

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Great American v. Jalaram

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 27, 2006
927 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Great American v. Jalaram

Case Details

Full title:GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. JALARAM, INC. OF STARKE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 27, 2006

Citations

927 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Villella v. Florida Surety Agents Ass'n

Having considered the "Motion to Dismiss," filed on November 20, 2006, as well as the appellants' response…