From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graziano v. Grace

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 26, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2300 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2300.

February 26, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2009, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Petitioner's "Traverse Response" to Respondents' Answer Filed, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge and the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The petitioner's objections are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Strawbridge is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

With the exception of a date that is cited incorrectly and has no bearing on the outcome (petitioner's untimely claim regarding the jury instruction concerning possession of a firearm was filed on September 6, 2005, rather than September 9, 2005), the magistrate judge's recitation of the factual and procedural history is accurate. His legal analysis is thorough and correct. Therefore, there is nothing to add to his well reasoned and exhaustive report.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and,

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Graziano v. Grace

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 26, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2300 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Graziano v. Grace

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD GRAZIANO v. JAMES L. GRACE, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 26, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2300 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2009)