From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grayson v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 31, 2023
677 S.W.3d 620 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

WD 85693

10-31-2023

In the MATTER OF Dorothy Irvin GRAYSON, Respondent, Nancy Wingate, Respondent, v. Minnette Williams, Appellant.

Daniel Stuart, Kansas City, MO counsel for appellant. Kimberly Brown, Cameron, MO counsel for respondent, Wingate. Dean Davidson, St. Joseph, MO counsel for respondent, Grayson.


Daniel Stuart, Kansas City, MO counsel for appellant.

Kimberly Brown, Cameron, MO counsel for respondent, Wingate.

Dean Davidson, St. Joseph, MO counsel for respondent, Grayson.

Before Division One: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Presiding Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge, and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Minnette Williams appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Clinton County, Probate Division, appointing the public administrator as guardian and conservator for her great-aunt, Dorothy Irvin Grayson. In two points on appeal, she contends that the trial court's appointment of the public administrator instead of her or her mother based on good cause exceptions to the preferences for appointment of guardians and conservators set out in section 475.050, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2022, was a misapplication of the law and was against the weight of the evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision is provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Grayson v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 31, 2023
677 S.W.3d 620 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Grayson v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Dorothy Irvin GRAYSON, Respondent, Nancy Wingate…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 31, 2023

Citations

677 S.W.3d 620 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)