From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grayned v. Citibank, N.A.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 19, 2012
NO. 02-11-00443-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-11-00443-CV

01-19-2012

SHERRY GRAYNED APPELLANT v. CITIBANK, N.A. APPELLEE


FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On December 9, 2011, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk's record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk's record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Grayned v. Citibank, N.A.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 19, 2012
NO. 02-11-00443-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Grayned v. Citibank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:SHERRY GRAYNED APPELLANT v. CITIBANK, N.A. APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-11-00443-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 19, 2012)