From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 19, 2020
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:19-CV-1519-P (W.D. La. Mar. 19, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:19-CV-1519-P

03-19-2020

DAVID FURTADO GRAY, Petitioner v. WARDEN, Respondent


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 8), noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition (ECF No. 1) is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, WITH PREJUDICE as to the jurisdictional issue, and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the merits of Petitioner's claim.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, at Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 19th day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gray v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 19, 2020
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:19-CV-1519-P (W.D. La. Mar. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Gray v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:DAVID FURTADO GRAY, Petitioner v. WARDEN, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2020

Citations

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:19-CV-1519-P (W.D. La. Mar. 19, 2020)