From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Apr 24, 2013
Case No. 7:95-CR-23 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 24, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 7:95-CR-23 (HL)

04-24-2013

HELEN R. ALEXANDER GRAY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 177) addressing Petitioner Helen Alexander Gray's Motion under § 2255 (Docs. 172, 176). The Court has considered Petitioner's Motion, the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, and Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 179). After review, the Court agrees with the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge dismissing the case. Petitioner's § 2255 Motion is not timely filed and therefore the case must be dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and made order of the Court.

Further, there is no evidence on the record of any substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Thus, a certificate of appealability is denied. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000).

____________________________

HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

Gray v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Apr 24, 2013
Case No. 7:95-CR-23 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Gray v. United States

Case Details

Full title:HELEN R. ALEXANDER GRAY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 24, 2013

Citations

Case No. 7:95-CR-23 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 24, 2013)