Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02024-WYD-MEH
11-08-2011
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on November 8, 2011.
Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Requests [filed November 7, 2011; docket #31] is denied. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d) provides that "[a] party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties have conferred as required by Rule 26(f)." There is no indication in the record that the parties have conducted a Rule 26(f) conference; the Scheduling Conference set for November 2, 2011 was vacated and the proposed Scheduling Order tendered solely by the Plaintiff indicates that the only communication between the parties was a letter written to Plaintiff by defense counsel. See docket #27 at 12. As set forth in this Court's October 27, 2011 order, the Court will reschedule the Scheduling Conference depending upon the resolution of the pending motion to stay and/or motion to dismiss.
The Court advises the Plaintiff that discovery requests (propounded at the appropriate time) need not be made by subpoena served upon a party opponent; rather, such discovery requests are made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 33, 34 and 36. Subpoenas pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 are served only upon third parties to the litigation.