From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Underwood Brothers

Supreme Court of Virginia. Richmond
Nov 12, 1936
167 Va. 182 (Va. 1936)

Opinion

November 12, 1936

Present, Campbell, C.J., and Holt, Hudgins, Gregory, Eggleston and Spratley, JJ.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT — Appeal and Error — Necessity for Review before Full Industrial Commission — Case at Bar. — In the instant case, an appeal from an award of the Industrial Commission, claimant made no application to the full commission for review of the order of a single member, but filed his petition in the Supreme Court of Appeals for a writ of error from that order although section 1887(61) of the Code of 1936 provides that no appeal shall be taken from the decision of one commissioner until a review of the case has been had before the full commission.

Held: That a motion to dismiss must be sustained.

Appeal from an award of the Industrial Commission.

Dismissed.

The opinion states the case.

Curry Carter, for the appellant.

David Meade White and R. E. Booker, for the appellees.


Defendants in error moved to dismiss the case on the ground that the order making the award, of which plaintiff in error complains, was made by only one member of the Industrial Commission.

When this case was formerly before this court (see Gray v. Underwood Brothers, 164 Va. 344 and 679, 180 S.E. 317, 182 S.E. 547), the award then under review was reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings before the commission, to be had in accord with the mandate and the written opinion of the court. The case was heard on December 31, 1935, before Commissioner Nickels, who in a written opinion set forth his finding of fact, and his interpretation of the law, as stated in the opinion of this court. Plaintiff in error made no application to the full commission for a review, but filed his petition in this court for writ of error from that order. Section 61 of the Workmen's Compensation Law (Acts 1918, chapter 400, section 61, as amended by Acts 1928, chapter 227) provides: "No appeal shall be taken from the decision of one commissioner until a review of the case has been had before the full commission."

The motion to dismiss will have to be sustained.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Gray v. Underwood Brothers

Supreme Court of Virginia. Richmond
Nov 12, 1936
167 Va. 182 (Va. 1936)
Case details for

Gray v. Underwood Brothers

Case Details

Full title:JOHN EDWARD GRAY v. UNDERWOOD BROTHERS, EMPLOYER, AND UNITED STATES…

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia. Richmond

Date published: Nov 12, 1936

Citations

167 Va. 182 (Va. 1936)
188 S.E. 151